About Me

Name: Tonewah
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

McBama, the Chicken Sandwich

Last night, the Republican and Democratic candidates for President met to have what the press is calling their final debate.  But is it really the last debate?  Both candidates have been invited to the real debate this Sunday night.  This debate will include ALL of the candidates for President.  McCain and Obama will most likely not attend. 
 
McCain complained last night about not having enough debates.  Obama complained about no real discussion of issues.  Wouldn't it now be hypocritical for them to avoid debating on the real issues and not the artificial talking points created by media hype they so claim to abhor?  Why are they afraid to discuss issues with the 4 other popular candidates running for President?
 
Yes, they are afraid.  The private little 'debate' they put on last night was paid for by the Democratic and Republican parties.  It was DESIGNED to be bereft of any topic other than those deemed safe by the 2 parties putting on the show.  Americans want to know why neither party has done anything positive to restore confidence in our economy.  Americans want to know what the Democrats and Republicans have done with our money.  Obama and McCain would soil themselves if they had to answer real questions from the American people.
 
Pundits will say that there needs to be more popular support for any other candidate before McCain and Obama agree to debate them.  I disagree.  I think it shows weakness of character to not give the American people a chance to hear a true debate.  If McCain is behind in the polls, he should want to grab votes from the Baldwins and Barrs... they could easily cost him the election if he doesn't.  If Obama truly wants to 'change' and 'unite', he should reach out to the McKinneys and Naders by allowing them to see how similar he is to their ideals.  It's the weakness of the 2 anointed ones that keeps them from engaging in actual debate, not their strength.
 
The debate is to be televised on C-Span this Sunday night.  Watch it.  You might actually hear some solutions to the problems ailing our nation.  They won't be coming from John McCain or Barak Obama, though.  These answers will actually make sense.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

USA: 40% Communist

Think we live in a Democratic Republic?  Think again.  Over time, we've allowed flawed communist concepts to creep into our laws.  The longer they remain, the more accustomed to them we become.  Some have been implemented so long, they seem to be right.  Do we even know what it means to be truly free anymore?
 
Let's take a look at a few of the 10 tenants of the Communist Manifesto, taken directly from the text as written by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. 
 
Number 1: Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 
Property Tax is charged in many states and municipalities.
 
To charge the people a tax on land they own is to charge them rent.  Although the law doesn't state that the property tax is rent, it acts in exactly the same manner as rent: If the people do not pay their rent/property tax to the government, they will be evicted. 
 
Number 2:  A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. 
Instituted in the USA in the first half of the 20th century.  Many states have adopted income taxes, as well.
 
Under the guise of an economic equalizer, the Federal Income Tax, policed by the IRS, was created to redistribute wealth,  much as Marx and Engels invisioned.  Like every government to adopt their theory, our government has failed to successfully redistribute weath, and has become controlled, in large part, by an oligarchy. 
 
Number 5:  Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly. 
Also instituted by the USA in the first half of the 20th century.
 
The Federal Reserve, or FED, controls the credit, currency, and, in effect, the American economy.  It is a monopoly of monetary policy.  Again, an oligarchy controls this institution created to curb inflation, reduce the depth of recessions and eliminate depressions.  The institution has failed the people, as communism always will.
 
Number 10:  Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. 
Public schools have been available in most of the USA for the better part of a century.
 
Public education has become required for all children in the USA.  Those who choose, through State law, to home-school or privately educate their children must use government approved curriculum or government licenced tutors.  Publicly funded 'technical schools' are are also available, as well as government run 'job corps' on-the-job training programs.
 
The other tenants of the Communist Manifesto are up for discussion in Congress, and are being touted by major party candidates for President.  Limits on inheritance are being imposed, which is the 3rd tenant of communism.  The draft, a conscription into the armed forces, also a communist staple, is no longer in effect, but could be reinstated.  Agriculture and manufacturing are being assimilated, in compliance with the 9th tenant.  But this isn't the real threat.
 
The real threat is from the oligarchy that controls these tenants.  The centralization of all other aspects of our lives are done at a corporate level.  This is the fascist element.  Government can, at it's discretion, commandeer communication and transportation from the corporations, the 6th tenant of communism.  They may even collaborate for the benefit of the oligarchy.  Chances are, they are probably already doing so under the guise of security.
 
Communism has never worked.  An oligarchy of the few have always dominated the many, never allowing the utopian ideal to be achieved.  Every one of the tenants Marx and Engels set up as requirements for the fair and equal distribution of power and wealth are easily subverted by those who seek to dominate.  Four of the ten tenants of  the Communist Manifesto are in FULL EFFECT in our country.  3 or 4 of the remaining tenants of communism could be upon us in such a short time, we'd be unable to defend against them.
 
We live in a time of great excess.  Our innovation and technology has allowed us more leisure time than ever in history.  We've become too accustomed to government intervening in our lives, and supplying our needs and wants.  We elect people that promise us things we can't afford and that violate our rights, in the name of convenience and safety.  We shouldn't let our apathy and lethargy cause us to lose the most precious gift given to man: Liberty.  Can we afford to elect those who would further the ideals of Marx and Engels?  Will Obama or McCain do anything to reverse the process of enslavement?  I think not.
 
Liberty is inborn, not given by man.  It can create the strongest nation in the world, yet is very fragile.  It is much easier to allow someone to place you in chains than it is to break free of them.  By that, I mean it's almost impossible to get liberties back that have been given away.  If we allow government to limit our liberty for any reason, we will not get those liberties back without a fight.
 
6/25/08:  For those searching for the '10 Tenants of Communism', I've copied and pasted the text from the Marx and Engels manifesto:

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.

Of course, before these can be implemented, the public must be disarmed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Revolution: A Manifesto

Ron Paul's new book, The Revolution: A Manifesto, is currently at #1 on the Amazon best sellers list, and debuted this week at #7 on the New York Times best seller list.  Other presidential candidates on the Amazon list:  Barack Obama with his best selling book, Audacity of Hope, at #113, Hillary Clinton's book is at #21, 380 and John McCain's currently resides at #4,758.  Obama's books are also on the NY Times best seller list, but they've been out for a long time, as have Clinton's and McCain's.
 
I read Dr. Paul's 1986 campaign tome, Freedom Under Siege: The Constitution After 200 Years.  He has written a lot about monetary policy, but that book was his first, I think, to approach a wider spectrum of topics.  There have been 2 or 3 books released this campaign season by Dr. Paul, but Revolution is the first one that doesn't contain previous writings.  I haven't read it yet, but hope to do so, soon.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fractured Right Wing

A quick apology to the readers who've noticed I haven't posted on Townhall in a while.  I was having trouble posting to this site for a bit.
 
Super Tuesday has passed, and the results were less than expected for my candidate, Ron Paul.  They were less than expected for Mitt Romney, as well.  I think they were less than hoped for by the GOP in general.  George Bush has cut a new path for the Republican party that is not heading in a direction that works.  There are a few hard-headed people still following him into that blind alley, but most people are either abandoning that path, or leaving the party altogether.  Until conservatives wake up and realize they need to get back to the principles upon which this country was founded, the party will continue to lose.
 
I think the problem lies in the party leadership.  Good leaders recognize when they've made mistakes, or at least will take the time to assess any choices they've made to see if they were correct.  McConnel seems clueless, and will not even listen to reason.  He seems too full of himself to even consider the obvious possibility that he, and the party elite, are wrong.  Bush exhibits very much the same behavior.  I truly fear for conservatism with that kind of leadership. 
 
The GOP is fracturing.  Self-importance has taken the place of common sense and conservatism.  Saying, "I'm not wrong" has become more important than the good of America.  I hate to admit it, but we deserve it.  We've blindly pushed whatever agenda our leaders pumped out, whether or not we totally agreed with it, just because we wanted to be right.  Now we're paying for it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »